Very rarely do I feature a book on this blog. That’s precisely why my
book reviews blog exists. But, this book, in many ways, is an exception. Not because it is extremely well written or because it’s a commercial superstar, but simply because of the depth of insight that it has.
I have been on a quest for some self-knowledge for the past many months. And, in many ways, the insights in this book have contributed greatly to a major jump in understanding.
Gifts Differing is written by Isabel Briggs Myers, the woman behind the world famous Myers Briggs Type Indicator. Typically these types are assigned to us based on our answers to various tests and it is recommended that we have this discussion with an MBTI certified coach.
There are numerous tests available online but I’m inclined not to put in any of the links here because every test practically gave me a different answer. And that’s why I went about trying to find the book and then read it. The basic structure of the types are as follows:
Extraversion vs Introversion (i.e. where do you get your energy from? People or yourself?)
Sensing vs Intuition (i.e. How do you process information? By taking in all facts or looking for possibilities?)
Thinking vs Feeling (i.e. How do you make decisions? Using impersonal logic or feelings?)
Judging vs Perceiving (i.e. How do you live your life? Are you regimented or open?)
Now, typically, you are assigned a combination of these letters. And the book will, of course, explain what this means, what are the typical strengths of somebody of this personality type, challenges if you are married to someone of an opposite type, how type takes formation in kids etc.
What I’ve realized is that we always have a clear dominant characteristic and a clear auxilary characteristic. The rest, really depends because, these dominant characters get set when we are kids and over time, we learn the benefits of the others and they gradually become a part of us.
I’ll be happy to explain my understanding of this from my own example – My end type, based on my self test, was E/I N F J.
I couldn’t conclude between E vs I because I answer the basic question (i.e. where do you get your energy?) as an introvert. However, when put in a social situation, I am extravert all over. So, I concluded I’m 50%.
N or intuition was a clear win. I am a poor observer and live in a world of possibilities. The split here was probably 80-20 and I’m paying attention more to sensing, especially over the last year, thanks to analysis.
F or feeling was also a clear winner. Probably 70-30. My decisions are definitely based on my own value system, and not on impersonal logic.
J or Judging. By nature, I am very self regimented but over time, my perception has improved and I guess I find that most in my views becoming more tolerant. This is probably 60-40 split.
The key concept here is that we need most of these processes. E vs I is less relevant because this is just how we get our energy. It’s almost an understanding on how to deal with ourselves. I have a set goal of not having more than 2 social nights in the week (self regimentation on display :)) because I end up becoming very tired after there. And I do love my weekends in solitude.
We need sensing because sensing helps in our observation capabilities, in us collecting all the facts, paying attention to the details.
We need intuition because intuition helps connect these observations together and seeks out possibilities.
We need thinking because we need impersonal logic to arrive at the ‘right’ decision.
We need feeling because we need to be able to understand how this could impact the people involved.
(eg: The right decision after a presentation may be to give honest feedback on what you thought about the concept. But it’s important that it’s done in a way that makes it easier for the person to accept the feedback. That process involves both T and F)
We need judging to make decisions.
We need perception to explore possibilities.
And it seems that the natural process is that we end up developing our dominant process very well. In my case, based on whether I am in ‘E’ i.e. with people or ‘I’ i.e. with myself, the dominant process is ‘F’ or ‘N’. And once we develop this dominant process, we can go on and work on our auxiliary ones because they ensure balance to our personality.
There was also a piece of advice that I got that helped me in this journey. (Courtesy: a wise friend)
This wise friend was also an MBTI practitioner. And I found his advice VERY useful as I was going through the journey, especially the sales person and suit analogy.
Probably the biggest impact is the increased understanding of people around me that I interact with from time to time. As with all cases, how we behave is a reflection of who we are. And when we understand ourselves, we do understand the world a bit better.
And it definitely reinforces a principle I believe in – we are all gifted, in different ways. We just have to find our place in the world, use our gifts and make a difference.
A great book, in short. I learnt a lot from it. I thought I’d quote Aristotle before wishing you a great day.
And I daresay he did know a thing or two about what he was talking about as well. :)