Vorfreude, in German, means “the pleasure of anticipation.”

There is a lot of pleasure in the anticipation – of big things and small.
Here’s to channeling more Vorfreude in our lives.
H/T: Sketchplanations
Vorfreude, in German, means “the pleasure of anticipation.”

There is a lot of pleasure in the anticipation – of big things and small.
Here’s to channeling more Vorfreude in our lives.
H/T: Sketchplanations
HBO is working on a 7 season Harry Potter TV series. Why? The obvious answer is that there’s money in the franchise and in a reboot.
But perhaps more importantly because the movies were not great.
The movies got a collection of casting decisions right – Severus Snape, Minerva McGonagall, Hermione Granger, the first Albus Dumbledore, Bellatrix Lestrange among a few others. They got a bunch of others pretty wrong.
While John Williams’ score was epic, they messed up a fair number of storylines and some epic scenes (e.g., Harry and Voldemort’s last duel) didn’t capture the greatness of the books.
In contrast, the three Lord of the Rings movies, for example, were exceptionally well done. The casting was great, the cinematography was excellent, the storytelling was superb, and the soundtrack was exceptional. It’ll take a brave soul to attempt a reboot of that storyline.
Similarly, despite the trainwreck that was season 8 of Game of Thrones, seasons 1-7 were arguably amongst the greatest TV series seasons of all time. Again, it was an exceptional mix of casting, storytelling, cinematography, and music.
As a result, work on both these franchises have focused on alternate storylines.
It is a good lesson on any kind of work. If it needs to be redone, it wasn’t great work in the first place.
It is very hard to say. We had a collection of people who made many discoveries and kept improving on previous ideas. It is hard to point to one person – whether it is Alan Turing or John Von Neuman or Grace Hopper or even the OGs Charles Babbage and Ada Lovelace – and call them the inventor of the computer.
This is the case with many great inventions. Even inventions like the radio or the telephone don’t have one clear inventor. Even if individuals like Alexander Graham Bell and Guglielmo Marconi have gotten the credit, the reality is that they simply bested somebody else from filing the invention in the patent office first.
This is what is intriguing about inventions in general. At some point, all the prevailing science makes an invention possible. Very few inventions – if any – wouldn’t have happened if the “sole inventor” who got the credit wasn’t around. There are always a series of people who are pushing the frontiers of science and inventing the future. The idea of the single inventor is nothing but a myth.
Then again, invention alone does little to drive positive impact. The many minds who compete and collaborate to commercialize an invention and drive widespread adoption deserve just as much credit (if not more in some cases).
“Who invented the computer?” is thus a question that doesn’t matter. If we seek to celebrate innovations, we must celebrate the many unsung heroes who made it possible.
If we seek to innovate ourselves, our goal must be to simply obsess about a problem and keep using the tools available to create the best possible solutions.
In time, good things follow.
Here are 2 lessons I’ve learnt about buying sneakers –
(1) We often think of foot size as the key variable when we buy sneakers. In reality, there are 4 variables that are important to consider when we buy sneakers –

Once we understand these, it becomes much easier to understand which sneakers will work best for us.
(2) If you wear sneakers all day, it is critical to rotate them. A sneaker’s foam needs time to recover. So, if you wear sneakers three days a week for example, you’ll need two pairs so you can alternate. Else you’ll find foam comfort and support deteriorating within ~6-9 months.
PS: I’m grateful for two patient and knowledgeable ladies at our local REI and Sports Basement for sharing all this sneaker wisdom.
Here are 16 things I’ve learnt about diet and metabolism over the past 5 years.
A teammate once beautifully summarized a key trait good leaders share in common – they are “shit umbrellas” for their team.
I know the visual that accompanies this term isn’t pretty. But stick with me.
Her observation was that teams are thrown all kinds of “shit” from above their level. And good leaders deflect the noise, ensure the team has relevant context, and enables them to focus on getting the job done.
It is a description I’ve come to appreciate more and more over the years.
Progress is non-linear.
One of those many simple and powerful ideas that is easy to understand and yet hard to internalize.
Periodic reminder to self – we can’t always do the big things, but we can do the small things with extraordinary care.
“You can write a narrative in your head, and spin yourself down a negative path, and beat yourself up and second guess. But what’s true is you made what you thought was the best decision in the moment. Then, you leave it behind. There’s no going back. Everyone makes mistakes. Everyone makes good decisions, bad decisions, or they just didn’t work. For me, it’s, ‘Learn the lesson. Leave the event.’” | Stephen Vogt, manager, The Cleveland Guardians
H/T: Om’s blog
In the 1700s, scurvy – caused by a deficiency of Vitamin C – was a deadly disease on voyages. Captain James Cook noticed that Dutch ships used to have less scurvy than English ships.
He wondered what they were doing that’s different and noticed they carried barrels of sauerkraut (fermented cabbage). So he decided to carry Sauerkraut which happens to contain a trace of vitamin C.
But he didn’t want to tell his men he was doing it in the hope that it would prevent scurvy. That would mean telling his men that he was taking them on a voyage so long that scurvy might kill them.
Instead, he had his officers eat at one place where the men could observe them. And, for a while, he served sauerkraut to the officers, but not to the men.
Then, finally, he said – “Well, the men can have it one day a week.”
In due course, the whole crew was eating sauerkraut.
Tact might be the most potent persuasion tool of them all.
H/T: Poor Charlie’s Almanack by Peter Kaufman