Author: alearningaday

Inspired by Seth’s ‘The Icarus Deception’, the BookBytess project’s description went through an overhaul in my head. It now reads..

—

The BookBytess Project is a community art project.

Our art? Sharing our learnings from books we read every day. Sharing is true learning after all and this is our attempt at getting better while making a difference in this world, one book byte at a time..

Like the jedi, we would love to welcome those serious minded folk with the deepest commitment to this cause to the BookBytess community.

If that’s you, send us a note on bookbytess@gmail.com

—

I had my doubts as to whether this one would take off and the early signs are promising. We hit our 100th posts in barely 30 days. There’s about 10 of us who are part of the community now with 4-5 really active (nearly every day posts).

I think it’s helped by the fact that we have a very simple process. If you want to join, all you have to do is send us an email. We share our Tumblr log in and password and you are ready to go!

You will notice I only mention number of posts and don’t mention view counts. We haven’t even set up Google Analytics yet because this project is about the artists i.e. us. It is about learnings that we take away from books. And, therein lies the specialty of the project – we care most  about the artists going through the art process.

In the past 30 days, there have been learnings from a whole host of books – So Good They Can’t Ignore You, The Icarus Deception, Start with Why, Willpower, The Lean Startup, The Price Advantage, Man’s Search for Meaning, Good to Great, Drive, Lincoln, etc. It makes for a really inspiring read. And every once in a while, the post really hits home. Like this one from “decembermist.”

If you aren’t sure you’d want to join us, add us to your reader. You won’t be disappointed.

And, if you’d like to join us to change the world, one book byte at a time, send us a note on bookbytess@gmail.com

We are very excited.

This week’s learning is from Quiet by Susan Cain and is part of a series on “Brainstorming and Peer Pressure”. (Part 1, 2, 3)

In 2005, Gregory Burns decided to conduct an updated version of the original experiments on peer pressure. In the “alone” case, 32 volunteers (men and women between 19-41 years) were subjected to various vision tests. They got 86.2% of the answers correct.

In the “group” case, they were asked to answer these questions with planted actors who confidently gave wrong answers. Here, they only got 59% correct.

The interesting addition was FMRI scans of their brains. These results were both disturbing and illuminating –

– Alone Case: The scans showed activity in the Occipital (visual) cortex, parietal cortex and some activity in the pre-frontal cortex when they made the conscious decision to answer the question. All normal.

– Group Case: The area of interest here was the pre-frontal cortex. If participants KNEW they were wrong but went with peer pressure, then activity was expected in the pre-frontal cortex as they would be actively deciding against the right answer. But, if the activity was in the visual, spatial area, it meant that the group had managed to somehow change the way they “perceived” the same images.
And, that’s exactly what happened..

Thus, peer pressure was shown to change the participant’s view of a situation. Groups are like mind altering substances. If the group believes the answer is A, you genuinely believe the answer is A.

Sketch by EB

Luckily, this was not always the case. Sometimes, individuals did pick the right answers. Here, the researchers observed activity in the amygdala, a small organ associated with upsetting emotions like the fear of rejection. Burns called it the pain of independence. And, these pains are critical to the survival of order in our society since our systems – elections, democracy, etc., depend on dissenting voices to drive change.

Here’s to ensuring we watch out for peer pressure effects during team meetings this week!

Every efficiency geek worth his/her salt knows that it’s easy to ignore the overheads that come with creating efficient system. Efficiency is best applied to things and, to a certain extent, to help hack human productivity. A focus on optimization, however, comes with a big downside – it’s very easy to lose focus on the real goal.

For instance, you could spend a lifetime trying to travel cheap – hack mileage and hotel programs, couch surf at a different place every day of the week, bookmark websites that watch airfares, etc. It’s great if this sort of stuff gets you energized. But, if the purpose is just to be able to afford travel, then it might be better to spend all that time getting to a job that pays you more.

All of a sudden, you can throw away all that travel related overhead and focus on what really matters – acquire skills that people want to pay you for!

It’s all about getting to the right question. And optimization tends to assume the role of the default answer once we set down the path.

It isn’t the case, of course.

Brad Feld had a fun post the other day on “Animal Spirit.”

“I’ve always felt like a bear. A big, cuddly, nice, soft bear. Mellow. I like to sleep. I like to eat. I wander around, a little curiously larger than comfortable in my slightly oversized body.”

This was the first time I’d heard of this concept, and I thought it would make for a great “Fun Friday” topic. I didn’t have to give it too much thought. I guess I always knew my animal spirit is a dog. In particular, I think it’s a Saint Bernard.

Why a dog? I am restless, full of energy, clumsy (I knock things over all the time!) and eager to learn. I also toggle between working hard and sleeping lots and am fiercely loyal to a small framily group.

Why Saint Bernard in particular? They need strong hands/influences early else they can get unruly (In the context of my life, the danger MAY have passed). They are good in crisis as rescuer dogs and it generally takes a lot to piss them off. Don’t, though.

And, of course, they are damn good looking. ;-)

Image Source

And yes, I am biased towards Saint Bernard thanks to having watched the Beethoven series of movies many many times as a kid.

So, what’s your animal spirit? Happy end-of-the-week all!

I interviewed Albert Wenger of Union Square Ventures for the Real Leaders project last Friday (The interview will be up in 2 and a half weeks). The wonderful thing about doing these interviews is that there are so many inspirational little nuggets from the stories of the folk we interview.

Albert had a great insight about good and bad days. He said “You don’t really know if a good day is a good day.” He went on to contrast two events – an event in his first start-up that was perceived as a big success and a deal that fell through after two years of negotiations. The first was met with great celebration while the second felt devastating.

In hindsight, however, the big success turned out to not be a success after all, while the failed negotiation turned out to be the best thing that could have happened. As the deal fell through, he explored new paths and went on to build a successful career as a venture capitalist. His learning was not too get too excited about the successes or too depressed about the failures. You never know what the future has in store.

What a wonderful insight! Loved it.

“If you can meet with triumph and disaster, and treat both imposters just the same.” | ‘If’ by Rudyard Kipling

2 simple steps –

1. “Smile” Folder: Keep a “smile” folder on your Outlook/Gmail and collect all positive feedback you receive. Be meticulous about this. Every time, you receive an email commending you on fantastic work, transfer it to the smile folder.

2. Positive Feedback Doc: Keep a document/One Note/EverNote page for all your positive feedback. I’ve written a few times before about scheduling check ins and reviews proactively. Ensure that you spend some time on things that are working well, take notes on your phone, and email them to yourself. Again, be meticulous about transferring them to this positive feedback doc.

This positive feedback doc turns out to be a wealth of information. We learn both from our successes and failures. So, it’s always useful to know what you did well so you can do it again, especially if it was done out on accident. Additionally, you may discover an area of strength that you didn’t know about.

And, finally, when you have that really bad day (not if, when..), the smile folder and the positive feedback doc will go a long way in making it better.

I loved the depth of the “Life of Pi” movie.

I think the idea that the fear of Richard Parker, the tiger, kept Pi alert while they were adrift in the ocean is a powerful one. The concept here is accountability.

Organizations have this built in thanks to bosses and boards of directors. I think we need accountability as human beings. And, like all things, I think accountability is a muscle that needs to be developed. It takes many years of practice and external guidance to develop the sort of will power that comes with accountability. A few master it very early.

For the rest of us, it helps to think about the Richard Parker’s in our lives – i.e. people whose wisdom we respect, and yet, people who we would hate letting down because they scare us just that little bit.

The downside to any such practice is that it can become a habit, a safe comfort zone. The tough part here is to keep doing this with the view that the ideal end state is when we are accountable just to ourselves.

The journey to that end state will be tough, painful and imperfect. Just like all good things..

I find it really ironical that graduation speakers advice the crowd to “dream”, “dare”, “fail”, etc., when they themselves do not dare to put away their typed out speech, and just speak. There must be a reason, of course. Some of these graduation speakers have probably given 1000’s of impromptu speeches in their life time. But, somehow, it seems that the norms get hold of them during a graduation speech.

It’s smooth. Too smooth, perhaps. And way too polished. In doing so, they insulate themselves from making a mistake but give up on being human.

A lot of growing up IS having our edges smoothened and polished. We learn to dress appropriately, eat appropriately and behave appropriately. The trouble with all this smoothening is that we often are taught to think “appropriately” as well. Don’t ask too many questions or bring up too radical an idea.

The trouble with the perfectly polished is that there is no edge. And, if there is no edge, there is no tension. And, if there is no tension, there is no giant leap, no progress, and certainly no magic.

This week’s book learning is from Quiet by Susan Cain and is part of a series on “Brainstorming and Peer Pressure”. (Part 1, 2)

Between the years 1951-56, psychologist Solomon Ashe conducted a series of experiments on “group influence.”

Student volunteers in a group were subjected to a straight forward vision test. 3 lines of varying lengths were shown and they were asked to indicate the longest and shortest lines. 95% answered correctly.
However, when Ashe planted actors in the group who confidently gave the same incorrect answer, the correct answers plunged to 25%.

This was staggering. 75% of the participants went along with the group’s wrong answer to at least 1 question despite the answer being painfully obvious.

Are groups really that detrimental to performance? Two separate studies seemed to indicate as much –
– During the 1988-89 basketball season, two NCAA basketball teams played 11 games without spectators owing to a measles outbreak leading to schools banning spectators. The players played much better on every measurable statistic, even when compared to their performance in front of adoring home fans.
– Participants who were tested on anagram puzzles performed much worse when someone was watching.

So, audiences may be rousing, but they are incredibly stressful.

Sketch by EB

This “evaluation apprehension” is one of the big reasons group brainstorming doesn’t result in creative ideas!

But, Ashe’s experiment took the question a step further – what exactly happened to the students when the actors started giving wrong answers? Did they consciously answer to “fit in?” Coming up next week..

Here’s to minimizing evaluation apprehension on critical tasks this week!

During my ten months at the Indian Indian School, Riyadh (Saudi Arabia), my lunch time routine was set – the moment the lunch bell rang, I would run down to the basketball court with about 20 others, munching my tuna sandwich lunch. One of the gang (on rotation) would have a coke can which he would finish quickly while the others waited impatiently. He would then proceed to crush it.

Voila! Our football was ready. There would be 30 odd groups like this one on the basket ball court. That was the marked territory of the 4th and 5th grade. We had more than 30 sections of 40 students each in every class. I think the court was larger than normal size but in the 45 minutes that followed, it didn’t matter. Neither did the heat (it is a desert, after all). We were just young boys looking for an outlet to our energy as we didn’t have the opportunity to play outside of school. And boy, did we have fun.

I learnt a few very important lessons from this experience. First, if you have a goal that you are dedicated to, all the noise around you just didn’t matter. In this case, all we could see was our coke can. (On occasion, we did splurge on a tennis ball…)

Second, a big part of great memories comes from making the most of meagre resources. The senior boys monopolized the football field and lack of pocket money meant we almost always didn’t have the right “equipment.” So, we made do with a coke can – who would have thought?

Finally, fun can be extremely low cost. As we grow up, we often get caught up in the right place, right food, right drink, etc. If you’re determined to have fun, you will.. the choice is ours.